Effective thermal conductivity of unsaturated soils based on deep learning algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil thermal conductivity plays a critical role in the design of geo-structures and energy transportation systems. Effective thermal conductivity (ETC) of soil depends primarily on the degree of saturation, porosity and mineralogical composition. These controlling parameters have nonlinear dependencies, thus making prediction a nontrivial task. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) model is developed based on the deep learning (DL) algorithm to predict the effective thermal conductivity of unsaturated soil. A large dataset is constructed including porosity, degree of saturation and quartz content from literature to train and validate the developed model. The model is constructed with a different number of hidden layers and neurons in each hidden layer. The standard errors for training and testing are calculated for each variation of hidden layers and neurons. The network with the least error is adopted for prediction. Two sand types independent of training and validation data reported in the literature are considered for prediction of the ETC. Five simulation runs are performed for each sand, and the computed results are plotted against the reported experimental results. The results conclude that the developed ANN model provides an efficient, easy and straightforward way to predict soil thermal conductivity with reasonable accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".