MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101746352

Trovare conforto nella cucina della nonna: narrazione architettonica per osservare il lutto a casa

2018· article· it· W3101746352 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge Rivera Gutierrez

Bibliographic record

VenueIN_BO. Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, la città e l'architettura · 2018
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse academic and cultural studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)DaughterShadow (psychology)GenealogyArtVisual artsBrotherArt historyAdvertisingHistoryLawPsychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A familiar set of scenes. A kitchen in a Japanese suburb. A grandmother peels vegetables, while keeping eye and ear on her daughter, who is asking for cooking advice. Time passes. Her grandsons and her son-in-law gather around, open the fridge, drink iced tea. The kitchen is filled with old utensils, hanging pots and pans on the walls. White tiles shine with the morning sun, pouring in right above the sink through the window that looks out to the exterior garden. A central table is used as a gathering surface, where later on, corn kernels will be prepared in tempura. This is a family mourning ritual. They’ve gathered to commemorate the anniversary of the death of the family’s eldest son, they do so by cooking and eating. The grandparental home becomes a sanctuary, a funerary shrine where the act of remembrance unfolds every year. The scene belongs to Hirokazu Kore’eda’s Still Walking (Aruitemo Aruitemo), a director in whose work “death looms over”1, constantly exploring and expressing the axiom that “life is often lived in the shadow of death.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIN_BO. Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, la città e l'architetturaSame topicDiverse academic and cultural studiesFrench-language works237,207