MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101798421 · doi:10.3390/w12113189

A WCSPH Particle Shifting Strategy for Simulating Violent Free Surface Flows

2020· article· en· W3101798421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsFree surfaceParticle (ecology)Surface (topology)Simple (philosophy)Consistency (knowledge bases)Limit (mathematics)Stability (learning theory)Particle methodKernel (algebra)Computer scienceMechanicsCompressibilityMathematical optimizationStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisGeometryGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we develop an enhanced particle shifting strategy in the framework of weakly compressible δ+-SPH method. This technique can be considered as an extension of the so-called improved particle shifting technology (IPST) proposed by Wang et al. (2019). We introduce a new parameter named “ϕ” to the particle shifting formulation, on the one hand to reduce the effect of truncated kernel support on the formulation near the free surface region, on the other hand, to deal with the problem of poor estimation of free surface particles. We define a simple criterion based on the estimation of particle concentration to limit the error’s accumulation in time caused by the shifting in order to achieve a long time violent free surface flows simulation. We propose also an efficient and simple concept for free surface particles detection. A validation of accuracy, stability and consistency of the presented model was shown via several challenging benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it