The Milstein Bipyridyl PNN Pincer Complex of Ruthenium Becomes a Noyori-Type Catalyst under Reducing Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydrogenation of the dearomatized PNN ligand of the Milstein bipyridyl complex RuH(CO)[PNN] (2) gives a square-pyramidal Ru(II) product RuH(CO)[pPNN] (5). The central ring of the pPNN ligand is a piperidine. A minor byproduct of the hydrogenation reaction is complex 6 which has a dimeric structure made of two Ru(II) fragments each possessing a partly hydrogenated PNN ligand. The structures of 5 and 6 have been elucidated by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. The PNN ligand of 2 is also hydrogenated under the conditions of the catalytic dehydrogenative coupling of ethanol to ethyl acetate. No direct evidence of the aromatized dihydride RuH2(CO)[PNN] (4) was found in this study. However, treating RuHCl(CO)[PNN] with Li[HBEt3] or reacting 2 with H2 at low temperature resulted in a structurally characterized hydride-bridged dimer (7) bearing intact aromatized bipyridyl ligands. M06-L/def2-QZVP DFT calculations provided insights into the thermodynamics of the stoichiometric reactions of this work and into the nature of the intermediates of the catalytic ester hydrogenation facilitated by RuH2(CO)[pPN(H)N] (8) formed from 5 under H2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".