MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 14959: Effect of Empagliflozin on Total Events of Myocardial Infarctions by Subtype in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

2020· article· en· W3101995399 on OpenAlexaff
David Fitchett, Bernard Zinman, Silvio E. Inzucchi, Christoph Wanner, Stefan D. Anker, Stuart Pocock, Stefan Kaspers, Jyothis T. George, Odd Erik Johansen, Waheed Jamal, Michaela Mattheus, Ola Vedin, Stefan Hantel, Søren S. Lund

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpagliflozinMedicineEMPAPlaceboInternal medicineType 2 diabetesMyocardial infarctionCardiologyDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In EMPA-REG OUTCOME®, the sodium-glucose transporter inhibitor, empagliflozin (EMPA), reduced the risk of first cardiovascular (CV) events primarily CV mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In analyses including total events, EMPA also reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Here we report the effects of EMPA on the total number of MIs by subtype. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive EMPA 10 mg, EMPA 25 mg, or placebo. We assessed the effect of pooled EMPA versus placebo on total (first plus recurrent) events of fatal and non-fatal MI using a negative binomial model with robust confidence intervals (CI) that preserves randomization and accounts for the within-patient correlation of multiple events. Post-hoc, we analyzed established subtypes of MI: Type 1: Typically related to plaque-rupture or thrombus; Type 2: Supply-demand; Type 3: Sudden-death related (i.e., fatal MI); Type 4: Percutaneous coronary intervention related; and Type 5: Coronary artery bypass graft related. Except type 3 MIs, MIs were non-fatal. The MIs, including subtypes, were centrally adjudicated and could be assigned to more than one subtype. Results: 7,020 patients were treated. Overall, there was 421 total events of MIs. Specifically, 299, 86, 26, 19, and 1 of the MIs were classified as type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 MIs, respectively (not mutually exclusive). Overall, EMPA reduced the risk of total events of MI by 21% versus placebo (rate ratio [95% CI], EMPA versus placebo: 0.79 [0.620; 0.998], p=0.0486; each MI only counted once). The overall reduction in total events of MIs by EMPA was driven by the effect on type 1 and 2 MIs, as well as type 3 MIs, with limited number of type 4 and 5 MIs (Figure). Conclusions: EMPA reduced the risk of total MI events with consistent effects across the most common etiologies, the type 1 (plaque-rupture or thrombus) and 2 (supply-demand) MIs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→