MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102081481 · doi:10.35420/jcohns.2005.16.2.275

Development of Semiflexible Digital Laryngoscope

2005· article· en· W3102081481 on OpenAlexaff
Soo‐Geun Wang, Jung Hoon Ro, Byung‐Joo Lee, Jin‐Choon Lee, Gye-Rok Jeon, Sang‐Kwon Lee, Chan Hum Park, Jeong-Hwan Ok, Tae‐Seok Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsNGC Aerospace (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiberscopeMedicineOpticsSurgeryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Laryngoscope is a basic equipment for examining the laryngopharynx. The pre-existing rigid laryngoscopes and fiberscopes have some inconvenience. The problems of the current rigid laryngoscopes are as follows: 1) absence of biopsy channel, 2) difficulties in exposing the larynx in cases of severe gag reflex, short neck, and children, 3) very vulnerable, 4) relatively high cost, and 5) not portable. In addition, disadvantages of the fiberscopes are as follows: 1) sometimes it is difficult to fix the tip to evaluate the lesion, especially in oropharynx, and nasopharynx, 2) very high cost, 3) frequent Moire sign (+), and 4) not portable. Authors have developed a portable digital rigid laryngoscope with flexible head for replacing the pre-existing rigid telescope and fiberscope. Methods and Materials: Recently developed high luminescent white LEDs (light emitting diodes) are placed at the head of the endoscope as a light source for the CCD image sensor which is also placed at the head with imaging lenses. This arrangement eliminates the bulky light sources like halogen or xenon lamps as well as the expensive light guiding optical fibers. We adopted non-spherical lens system to prevent peripheral image distortion and Moire sign, and to enhance depth of field. In addition, it can be bent not only to downward but also to upward upto 130°. Results: The advantages of portable digital rigid laryngoscope demonstrated as following: 1) Not only the laryngopharynx but also the nasopharynx, oral cavity, and oropharynx could be obserbed 2) The laryngopharyngeal pathologic lesion could be biosied through biopsy channel, 3) The laryngeal pathology can be easily removed because the flexible part is supported firmly through the combined rigid part. In case of poor laryngeal exposure through suspension laryngoscopy, it can also be easily removed through biopsy channel. 4) it can be checked the air leakage using air pump. Conclusion: Portable digital rigid laryngoscope with rigid body and flexible head has a lot of advantage over simple fiberscope or rigid laryngoscope. It is a very useful equipment especially for otorhinolaryngologists. In addition, it can be applied for thoracoscope, laparoscope, cystourethroscope, colposcope, etc. (J Clinical Otolaryngol 2005;16:275-280)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Otolaryngology Head and Neck SurgerySame topicVoice and Speech DisordersFrench-language works237,207