Ultraviolet Broad Absorption Features and the Spectral Energy Distribution of the Quasar PG 1351+64
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a moderate-resolution (~20 km s -1 ) spectrum of the mini-broad absorption line quasar (QSO) PG 1351+64 between 915 and 1180 Å, obtained with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer ( FUSE ). Additional low-resolution spectra at longer wavelengths were also obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) and ground-based telescopes. Broad absorption is present on the blue wings of C III λ977, Lyβ, O VI λλ1032, 1038, Lyα, N V λλ1238, 1242, Si IV λλ1393, 1402, and C IV λλ1548, 1550. The absorption profile can be fitted with five components at velocities of ~-780, -1049, -1629, -1833, and -3054 km s -1 with respect to the emission-line redshift of z = 0.088. All the absorption components cover a large fraction of the continuum source, as well as the broad-line region. The O VI emission feature is very weak, and the O VI/Lyα flux ratio is 0.08, one of the lowest among low-redshift active galaxies and QSOs. The UV continuum shows a significant change in slope near 1050 Å in the rest frame. The steeper continuum shortward of the Lyman limit extrapolates well to the observed weak X-ray flux level. The absorbers' properties are similar to those of high-redshift broad absorption line QSOs. The derived total column density of the UV absorbers is on the order of 10 21 cm -2 , unlikely to produce significant opacity above 1 keV in the X-ray. Unless there is a separate, high-ionization X-ray absorber, the QSO's weak X-ray flux may be intrinsic. The ionization level of the absorbing components is comparable to that anticipated in the broad-line region; therefore, the absorbers may be related to broad-line clouds along the line of sight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".