MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102192018 · doi:10.1163/2667078x-00502005

Does Trade with Low-wage Countries Cause Wage Inequality?

2004· article· en· W3102192018 on OpenAlexaff
Jaleel Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian international studies review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsWage inequalitySubsidyInequalityWageLabour economicsTechnological changeCapital (architecture)Efficiency wageProduction (economics)Low wageMacroeconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the question as to whether trade with low-wage countries has contributed to wage inequality in high-income countries, as predicted by the Stolper-Samuelson theorem. The analysis is undertaken within the framework of a simple two-sector model. A major innovation of the study is to incorporate the role of trade barriers and subsidies in inducing skill-augmenting technological changes in import-affected sectors and, hence, in reducing the demand for and wages of unskilled labor. In particular, factor bias arising from the move toward capital- and skill-based production may have contributed to other trends in wage inequality. The paper finds that trade pressures alone could not have been much of a reason for pronounced wage inequality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian international studies reviewSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207