An extensive posterior circulation infarction secondary to primary hyperthyroidism accompanied with superior mesenteric artery syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hyperthyroidism-related anterior circulation ischemic events have been well documented; however, posterior circulation infarction is rarely reported, not to mention with superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS), which has never been reported concurrently. We describe, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of hyperthyroidism-related cerebellar infarction accompanied with SMAS. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 22-year-old women presented with palpitation, postprandial vomiting, and acute body weight loss. Enlarged thyroid gland was discovered in physical examination and Graves disease was diagnosed by blood test; therefore, Propylthiouracil and β-blocker were prescribed. Sudden onset conscious disturbance accompanied with apnea was noted during hospitalization. DIAGNOSIS: Computed tomography (CT) revealed cerebellar infarction with severe cerebellar swelling and tonsil herniation; hence, emergent suboccipital craniotomy and bilateral tonsillectomy were performed. INTERVENTIONS: Nevertheless, persisted poor passage of liquid diet during nasogastric tube feeding was noted after operation. CT of abdomen showed a sharp aorta-SMA angle (15°) and a short distance between aorta and SMA (6 mm) indicating a diagnosis of SMAS. OUTCOMES: After parental nutrition supplement and progressive rehabilitation program, she recovered to a modified Rankin Scale of 3. CONCLUSION: Although rarely reported, hyperthyroidism-related sympathetic hyperstimulation, vasculopathy could result in potentially deadly posterior circulation infarction. Furthermore, SMAS should be considered in the cases of hyperthyroidism with prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms even after treatment and should be treated simultaneously, since SMAS exacerbates depletion of intravascular volume. Further study to clarify the relation between hyperthyroidism and posterior circulation hemodynamic status is suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".