Vertex-Corrected Tunneling Inversion in Superconductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The conventional theory of superconductivity is considered to be one of the most well-established theories in condensed matter physics with agreement between theory and experiment being on the order of a few percent or less. A key assumption in this theory is that there is a small parameter, the ratio of the characteristic phonon frequency to the Fermi energy that allows one to neglect higher-order terms (vertex corrections) in the electron self-energy. This is commonly known as Migdal's theorem[1] which was formulated for the superconducting state by Eliashberg[2] to give the standard Migdal-Eliashberg (ME) theory of superconductivity. While this approximation appears to be very successful for low-temperature superconductors, the recent discovery of potentially electron-phononmediated high T c superconductors such as BKBO[3] and the doped fullerenes[4], with high phonon energies and small bandwidths, motivates an investigation of the effec
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".