MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3102300302

Engaging Boys in a Comprehensive Model to Address Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Schools

2020· article· en· W3102300302 on OpenAlexaff
Sharmishtha Nanda, Priyanka Banerjee, Ravi Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinitySexual violenceFormative assessmentPsychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyGender studiesCriminologySociologyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevention of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) requires attention to changing social norms, particularly gender norms, to promote gender-equitable attitudes and to reduce acceptance of violence. Among the many strategies that are being used to fight SGBV, an emerging theme has been the need to engage young boys and men. Over recent decades, frameworks have evolved to recognize not just women’s vulnerabilities to SGBV, but also the vulnerabilities of men to SGBV. There is also greater recognition that violence is used as an instrument to oppress both women and men, as well as young boys and girls, if they are perceived to act against established social norms. However, given that SGBV is predominantly directed against girls and women, it is critical to influence boys during formative periods of their lives to change their attitudes about gender roles and masculinity norms. We undertook a formative, exploratory qualitative research study to understand forms of SBGV experienced by adolescents in schools and to identify entry points to address it, primarily within school-spaces, in Bihar and Tamil Nadu (India). Findings strongly suggest that gender norms not only operate in the private lives of young girls and boys, but are heavily reinforced in schools through various practices and behaviors of teachers and management, as well as policies that differentiate girls and boys, leading to multiple experiences of physical, mental, and sexual violence for children over a prolonged period in their schooling years. Findings also point to weak response mechanisms to violence in schools and strong ‘normalization’ of violence by girls and boys as victims and perpetrators, respectively, but also as passive recipients of structural inequalities, pushing both genders into accepting a cycle of violence for the rest of their lives. Ultimately, this research offers a theory of change for intervention programs to address SGBV in school spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicIntimate Partner and Family Violence→French-language works237,207→