MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102406764 · doi:10.1145/3416014.3424581

Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for Controller Area Networks

2020· article· en· W3102406764 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Minawi, Jason Whelan, Abdulaziz Almehmadi, Khalil El‐Khatib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCAN busDenial-of-service attackScalabilityComputer securityIntrusion detection systemBluetoothSAFERComputer networkAutomotive industryAuthentication (law)WirelessEmbedded systemThe InternetEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The automotive industry continues to innovate at an exponential rate to provide a safer and more efficient experience for consumers. Autonomous vehicles and Vehicle-to-Everything technologies are at the forefront of defining the future of transportation. Enabling vehicles to connect to various services has exposed critical in-vehicle networks such as the Controller Area Network (CAN) to potential exploitation by adversaries. In its standard form, the CAN bus suffers from multiple vulnerabilities such as limited bandwidth and lack of authentication. Attacks can be initiated through physical and wireless mediums, exploiting diagnostic interfaces, Bluetooth and infotainment systems to compromise the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data communication within vehicles. In this paper, a holistic, comprehensive, Machine Learning-Based intrusion detection system for the CAN bus is proposed to secure the critical in-vehicle network. The proposed system is modular, scalable and can be adapted to the ever-changing threat landscape of cyber vehicle attacks. On an unseen testing dataset, our system achieved 100% accuracy in protecting against denial of service and multiple impersonation injection attacks, as well as 95.67% accuracy of fuzzy injection attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207