PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ETNOLINGUISTIK BERBASIS NILAI-NILAI ISLAM NUSANTARA UNTUK MAHASISWA PGSD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was (1) to apply the ethnolingistic learning model based on Islamic values of the nusantara to students of Elementary School Teacher Education (PGSD). This research is development research. The stages in this study took seven steps from the ten R D steps offered by Gall and Borg. The data to be collected in this study is data that shows the teaching material and design of ethnolinguistic learning based on Islamic Nusantara values for PGSD students. The product trial subjects were lecturers and PGSD students at Muria Kudus University. The results of this study are ethnolinguistic learning models based on Islamic values of the nusantara and teaching materials. Based on the results of the discussion it can be concluded that the ethnolinguistic learning model based on Islamic values of the nusantara and ethnolinguistic teaching materials based on Islamic values of the nusantara are appropriate and meet the requirements to be used as learning models and teaching materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it