OpenProt 2021: deeper functional annotation of the coding potential of eukaryotic genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OpenProt (www.openprot.org) is the first proteogenomic resource supporting a polycistronic annotation model for eukaryotic genomes. It provides a deeper annotation of open reading frames (ORFs) while mining experimental data for supporting evidence using cutting-edge algorithms. This update presents the major improvements since the initial release of OpenProt. All species support recent NCBI RefSeq and Ensembl annotations, with changes in annotations being reported in OpenProt. Using the 131 ribosome profiling datasets re-analysed by OpenProt to date, non-AUG initiation starts are reported alongside a confidence score of the initiating codon. From the 177 mass spectrometry datasets re-analysed by OpenProt to date, the unicity of the detected peptides is controlled at each implementation. Furthermore, to guide the users, detectability statistics and protein relationships (isoforms) are now reported for each protein. Finally, to foster access to deeper ORF annotation independently of one's bioinformatics skills or computational resources, OpenProt now offers a data analysis platform. Users can submit their dataset for analysis and receive the results from the analysis by OpenProt. All data on OpenProt are freely available and downloadable for each species, the release-based format ensuring a continuous access to the data. Thus, OpenProt enables a more comprehensive annotation of eukaryotic genomes and fosters functional proteomic discoveries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".