MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102520527 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09526

Constructive Polynomial Partitioning for Algebraic Curves in\n $\\mathbb{R}^3$ with Applications

2019· article· en· W3102520527 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Boris Aronov, Esther Ezra, Joshua Zahl

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIsrael Science FoundationUnited States - Israel Binational Science FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsBounded functionDegree (music)CombinatoricsPolynomialInteger (computer science)Algebraic numberDiscrete mathematicsAlgebraic curve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2015, Guth proved that for any set of $k$-dimensional bounded complexity\nvarieties in $\\mathbb{R}^d$ and for any positive integer $D$, there exists a\npolynomial of degree at most $D$ whose zero set divides $\\mathbb{R}^d$ into\nopen connected sets, so that only a small fraction of the given varieties\nintersect each of these sets. Guth's result generalized an earlier result of\nGuth and Katz for points.\n Guth's proof relies on a variant of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, and for $k>0$,\nit is unknown how to obtain an explicit representation of such a partitioning\npolynomial and how to construct it efficiently. In particular, it is unknown\nhow to effectively construct such a polynomial for bounded-degree algebraic\ncurves (or even lines) in $\\mathbb{R}^3$.\n We present an efficient algorithmic construction for this setting. Given a\nset of $n$ input algebraic curves and a positive integer $D$, we efficiently\nconstruct a decomposition of space into $O(D^3\\log^3{D})$ open "cells," each of\nwhich meets $O(n/D^2)$ curves from the input. The construction time is\n$O(n^2)$. For the case of lines in $3$-space we present an improved\nimplementation, whose running time is $O(n^{4/3} \\log^{O(1)} n)$. The constant\nof proportionality in both time bounds depends on $D$ and the maximum degree of\nthe polynomials defining the input curves.\n As an application, we revisit the problem of eliminating depth cycles among\nnon-vertical lines in $3$-space, recently studied by Aronov and Sharir (2018),\nand show an algorithm that cuts $n$ such lines into $O(n^{3/2+\\epsilon})$\npieces that are depth-cycle free, for any $\\epsilon > 0$. The algorithm runs in\n$O(n^{3/2+\\epsilon})$ time, which is a considerable improvement over the\npreviously known algorithms.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207