MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102534359 · doi:10.1002/poc.4168

Revisiting the photochemistry 2,5‐dihydroxy benzoic acid (gentisic acid): Solvent and pH effect

2020· article· en· W3102534359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Organic Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhotochemistryAqueous solutionBenzoic acidSolventIntramolecular forceDeprotonationExcited stateConformational isomerismGentisic acidProtonFluorescenceOrganic chemistryMoleculeIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the present study, we have reinvestigated photochemistry of 2,5‐dihydroxy benzoic acid (DHBA) in a series of organic solvents of different polarities and the aqueous solution of varying pH from 1 to 14. The investigation was carried out using steady‐state and nanosecond (ns) time‐domain fluorescence measurement techniques at room temperature. Some hitherto not explored spectral features with new insight on different forms of DHBA are reported. It is found that DHBA exists as monoanionic and neutral forms in various polar protic, aprotic, and nonpolar solvents. In aqueous solution (pH 1 to 14), neutral, monoanionic, and dianion forms are found to be responsible for the observed optical spectral profiles. The observed significant Stokes shift in emission is attributed to species undergoing excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) in different solvents. The analysis presented in this work elucidates and validate the presence of various species and conformers of DHBA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it