Human brain function during pattern separation follows hippocampal and neocortical connectivity gradients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract Episodic memory is our ability to remember past events accurately. Pattern separation, the process of of orthogonalizing similar aspects of external information into nonoverlapping representations, is one of its mechanisms. Converging evidence suggests a pivotal role of the hippocampus, in concert with neocortical areas, in this process. The current study aimed to identify principal dimensions of functional activation associated with pattern separation in hippocampal and neocortical areas, in both healthy individuals and patients with lesions to the hippocampus. Administering a pattern separation fMRI paradigm to a group of healthy adults, we detected task-related activation in bilateral hippocampal and distributed neocortical areas. Capitalizing on manifold learning techniques applied to parallel resting-state fMRI data, we could identify that hippocampal and neocortical activity patterns were efficiently captured by their principal gradients of intrinsic functional connectivity, which follows the hippocampal long axis and sensory-fugal cortical organization. Functional activation patterns and their alignment with these principal dimensions were altered in patients. Notably, inter-individual differences in the concordance between task-related activity and intrinsic functional gradients were correlated with pattern separation performance in both patients and controls. Our work outlines a parsimonious approach to capture the functional underpinnings of episodic memory processes at the systems level, and to decode functional reorganization in clinical populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".