MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping the Dynamic Recruitment of Spinal Neurons during Fictive Locomotion

2020· article· en· W3102677791 on OpenAlexafffund
Vladimir Rančić, Klaus Ballanyi, Simon Gosgnach

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersInstitute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and AddictionCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsCentral pattern generatorNeuroscienceSpinal cordCpG siteBiologyBiological neural networkLocomotor activityAnatomyInhibitory postsynaptic potentialRhythmPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic rhythmic activity that underlies stepping is generated by a neural network, situated in the spinal cord, known as the locomotor central pattern generator (CPG). While a series of lesion experiments have demonstrated that the mammalian locomotor CPG is distributed throughout the ventral portion of the caudal spinal cord, the specific transverse distribution of this neural network is unclear. Here we evoke fictive locomotor activity of various frequencies in upright spinal cords prepared from male and female neonatal mice. This preparation enables us to use an imaging approach to identify locomotor-related cells across the transverse plane of the spinal cord. Results indicate that there is a clear shift in the recruitment of cells toward the ventromedial, and away from the ventrolateral, spinal cord as the frequency of fictive locomotion increases. Surprisingly, the analysis of multiple frequencies of fictive locomotion in the same spinal cord indicates that few neurons are involved in locomotor outputs across multiple speeds. Collectively, these experiments allow us to map the transverse distribution of the locomotor CPG and highlight the pattern of dynamic recruitment that occurs within this neural circuit as the frequency is altered. Our findings are consistent with data indicating that there is a speed-dependent recruitment of interneuronal populations during locomotion and suggest that the locomotor CPG is not a static network, but rather the specific cells recruited vary extensively based on demand. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In this article, we use an imaging approach to identify all those cells that are rhythmically active at the same frequency as fictive locomotion recorded from the ventral roots of the isolated spinal cord. These experiments allow us to map the distribution of locomotor-related cells across the transverse plane of the spinal cord and identify the recruitment pattern of these cells as the frequency of locomotor outputs is altered. Our results indicate that there are drastic changes in the specific neurons activated at different frequencies and provide support for the concept that the locomotor central pattern generator is a modular network with speed-dependent recruitment of interneuronal components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207