MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102719164 · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.129

A Holistic Multi-Domain Association Model for Industrial Data

2020· article· en· W3102719164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Manufacturing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicProduct Development and Customization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersWestern Washington University
KeywordsCladogramComputer scienceSimplicityDomain (mathematical analysis)Representation (politics)Data miningTheoretical computer scienceTree (set theory)Artificial intelligenceCladisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data is collected from different industrial domains. Organizing that data makes change anticipation more planned and streamlined. This paper introduces a novel holistic model of associating different domains of industrial data. The model establishes a tree graph called cladogram to create a unified classification of data from market segments, product design and manufacturing capabilities and it is expandable beyond these domains. The cladogram is produced by the widely used biological Cladistics analysis, without modification. This approach has a great degree of simplicity without introducing an extra layer of mathematical modelling, while resulting in a data-inclusive graphical representation. A case study of automated and flexible assembly is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the model and its simplicity. Model results are significant, since they could reveal associations of the definitions of the objects from different data domains, which were used later in response to future changes in those domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.060 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it