MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102874119 · doi:10.5194/epsc2020-1062

Multi-angular Observations of Martian Bright Slope Streaks

2020· article· en· W3102874119 on OpenAlexaff
Adomas Valantinas, P. Becerra, L. L. Tornabene, A. Pommerol, Ernst Hauber, N. Thomas, A. S. McEwen, G. Cremonese

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrbiterMartianStreakMartian surfaceMars Exploration ProgramMass wastingMineralogyPhysicsGeomorphologyAstrobiologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Bright slope streaks are enigmatic surface features of increased albedo found on Martian slopes in low thermal inertia regions [1, 2]. These elongated features are thought to form as the more common dark slope streaks [3, 4] gradually fade or brighten with time [5]. In fact, in a few rare cases slope streaks have been observed to have bright and dark sections [1, 5, 6], which could be taken as evidence of this transition. The fading rate of dark slope streaks has been shown to be around 40 years [7] but the contrast reversal rate is unknown. Several hypotheses attempt to explain the origin of dark slope streaks: Dry-based models encompass formation through dust mass wasting, avalanching or granular flows [1, 6, 8]; and aqueous models cite subsurface aquifers as sources, lubricated dust flows and ground staining from saline fluids [9-13]. Various properties of dark slope streak populations were studied in detail to address their origin [14-16]. However, little is known about the physical parameters that would affect their photometry, e.g., surface texture, roughness and grain size. Here, we address this issue by acquiring multi-angular observations of bright slope streaks using the Colour and Stereo Surface Imaging System (CaSSIS) [17] onboard the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO). When necessary and available, we complement these observations with higher-resolution images of our study sites taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s (MRO) High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE). To obtain regional context for our observations, we used a global Context Camera (CTX) mosaic [18] to grid-map the locations of bright slope streaks in the Arabia Terra region [19].Results: We surveyed the distribution of bright slope streaks in Arabia Terra using a grid map divided into ~16,000 hexagonal facets, each 20 km in diameter, and each qualitatively surveyed. Additionally, we documented ~30 locations of partially dark-bright slope streaks. We targeted one such peculiar case (first observed by the Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) [1]) with CaSSIS and HiRISE (Fig. 1). This example features a bright apex that begins to darken towards the middle, and at the distal end appears indistinguishable from a dark slope streak. This same albedo reversal is visible under various lighting geometries (23°-86° incidence). We used these multi angular observations as the basis for photometric measurements of this slope streak, which are seen in Fig 2. We measured I/F values (detected irradiance (I) over the solar irradiance at zero incidence (F), such that I/F = 1 for a normally illuminated, perfectly diffuse reflector) of dark and bright slope streak regions-of-interest (ROIs), and ratioed them over the ROIs of the surrounding surface. This method avoids the reflectance dependency on local slope. Fig. 2 indicates that the dark (black squares) and the bright (red circles) part of the slope streak is up to 4.5% darker and 3.5% brighter respectively. It also appears that between years 2009-2014 (three HiRISE observations) the dark slope streak ROI is darker than in the three CaSSIS observations taken in 2020.Discussion: In the past, the contrast reversal of slope streaks was attributed to either physical fading (coverage by atmospheric dust fallout) [5] or viewing geometry effects [6]. Loose snow avalanches on Earth were suggested as a possible analogous process where the latter effect occurs [e.g. 1, 6]. Interestingly, many dark, bright and dark-bright streaks are frequently found on the same slope, which suggests that their albedo is independent of viewing geometry. This is supported by the multiple observations seen in Fig. 1. Reflective behavior appears to be independent of illumination geometry, i.e. the slope streak exhibits the same contrast reversal in all observations. Further, our quantitative photometric measurements (Fig. 2) support this finding. The ratio of the dark ROI and the surroundings within 3 HiRISE observations is almost linear, but the earlier HiRISE image exhibits a higher ratio. The later (2020) 3 CaSSIS images of the dark ROI ratios illustrate a more faded streak. This fading could be a result of atmospheric dust fallout (e.g. dust storm in MY34), but this would not explain the bright ROI behavior. Another hypothesis is that the fading is related to gravity-c­­­ontrolled processes. Particles at the top of the streak might be more easily churned by wind and transported downwards by mass wasting. To investigate these two hypotheses, we will use a CaSSIS-based Digital Terrain Model (DTM) to accurately measure slopes and constrain their photometric effects, and a reflectance model based on Hapke theory [20] to simulate the difference in spectral reflectance between regolith with a variety of grain size distributions.References: [1] Sullivan R. et al. (2001) JGR, 106, 23607-23633. [2] Schorghofer N. et al. (2002) GRL, 29, 2126. [3] Morris, E. C. (1984) JGR, 87, 1164–1178. [4] Ferguson H. M. & Lucchitta B. K. (1984) NASA Tech. Memo. 86246, 188-190. [5] Schorghofer N. et al. (2007) Icarus, 191, 132-140.[6] Baratoux D. et al. (2006) Icarus, 183, 30-45. [7] Bergonio J. R. et al. (2013) Icarus, 225, 194-199. [8] Chuang F. C. et al. (2007) GRL, 34(L20204). [9] Ferris J. C. et al. (2002), GRL, 29. [10] Miyamoto H. et al. (2004) JGR, 109, E06008. [11] Kreslavsky M. A. and Head J. W. (2009) Icarus, 201, 517-527. [12] Head J. W. et al. (2007) AGU Fall Abstracts, (#P22A-08). [13] Bhardwaj A. et al. (2019) Rev. Geophys., 57, 48-77. [14] Schorghofer N. and King C. M. (2011) Icarus, 216, 159-168. [15] Brusnikin E. S. et al. (2016) Icarus, 278, 52-61. [16] Mushkin A. et al (2010), GRL, 37, L22201. [17] Thomas N. et al. (2017), Space Sci. Rev, 212, 1897-1944. [18] Dickson J. L. et al. (2018), LPSC XLIX, Abstract #2083. [19] Ramsdale J. D. et al. (2017) PSS, 140, 49-61. [20] Hapke, B., 2012. Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207