Bibliographic record
Abstract
By using the Adaptive Optics with a Laser for \n Astronomy system at the 3.6 m telescope of the \n Calar Alto Observatory, we detected a faint red \n star in the apparent vicinity of FU Ori, the \n prototype of the FUor outburst stars. \n Independent confirmation of the detection is \n obtained from archival Probing the Universe with \n Enhanced Optics/Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope \n images. The separation between the companion \n candidate and FU Ori is 0.50", and their \n brightness contrast is around 4 mag. We discuss \n the possible nature of the newly detected star \n based on near-infrared photometry and its proper \n motion relative to FU Ori. The photometric data \n are consistent with a nearby late-type \n main-sequence star, a background giant star, and \n a pre-main-sequence star. On the basis of the \n proper motion and the stellar surface density in \n the direction toward FU Ori, we argue that the \n probabilities of the first two options are very \n low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".