MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103111471 · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.25.11.116010

Integrating photoacoustic tomography into a multimodal automated breast ultrasound scanner

2020· article· en· W3103111471 on OpenAlexaff
Corey J. Kelly, Amir Refaee, Septimiu E. Salcudean

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScannerBreast imagingImaging phantomComputer scienceBiomedical engineeringIterative reconstructionMaterials scienceUltrasoundTomographyOpticsArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerPhysicsMedicineMammographyAcousticsCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SIGNIFICANCE: Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is a promising emergent modality for the screening and staging of breast cancer. To minimize barriers to clinical translation, it is common to develop PAT systems based upon existing ultrasound hardware, which can entail significant design challenges in terms of light delivery. This often results in inherently non-uniform fluence within the tissue and should be accounted for during image reconstruction. AIM: We aim to integrate PAT into an automated breast ultrasound scanner with minimal change to the existing system. APPROACH: We designed and implemented an illuminator that directs spatially non-uniform light to the tissue near the acquisition plane of the imaging array. We developed a graphics processing unit-accelerated reconstruction method, which accounts for this illumination geometry by modeling the structure of the light in the sample. We quantified the performance of this system using a custom, modular photoacoustic phantom and graphite rods embedded in chicken breast tissue. RESULTS: Our illuminator provides a fluence of 2.5 mJ cm - 2 at the tissue surface, which was sufficient to attain a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 8 dB at 2 cm in chicken breast tissue and image 0.25-mm features at depths of up to 3 cm in a medium with moderate optical scattering. Our reconstruction scheme is 200 × faster than a CPU implementation; it provides a 25% increase in SNR at 2 cm in chicken breast tissue and lowers image error by an average of 31% at imaging depths >1.5 cm compared with a method that does not account for the inhomogeneity of the illumination or the transducer directivity. CONCLUSIONS: A fan-shaped illumination geometry is feasible for PAT; however, it is important to account for non-uniform fluence in illumination scenarios such as this. Future work will focus on increasing fluence and further optimizing the ultrasound hardware to improve SNR and overall image quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical OpticsSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207