Integrating photoacoustic tomography into a multimodal automated breast ultrasound scanner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is a promising emergent modality for the screening and staging of breast cancer. To minimize barriers to clinical translation, it is common to develop PAT systems based upon existing ultrasound hardware, which can entail significant design challenges in terms of light delivery. This often results in inherently non-uniform fluence within the tissue and should be accounted for during image reconstruction. AIM: We aim to integrate PAT into an automated breast ultrasound scanner with minimal change to the existing system. APPROACH: We designed and implemented an illuminator that directs spatially non-uniform light to the tissue near the acquisition plane of the imaging array. We developed a graphics processing unit-accelerated reconstruction method, which accounts for this illumination geometry by modeling the structure of the light in the sample. We quantified the performance of this system using a custom, modular photoacoustic phantom and graphite rods embedded in chicken breast tissue. RESULTS: Our illuminator provides a fluence of 2.5 mJ cm - 2 at the tissue surface, which was sufficient to attain a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 8 dB at 2 cm in chicken breast tissue and image 0.25-mm features at depths of up to 3 cm in a medium with moderate optical scattering. Our reconstruction scheme is 200 × faster than a CPU implementation; it provides a 25% increase in SNR at 2 cm in chicken breast tissue and lowers image error by an average of 31% at imaging depths >1.5 cm compared with a method that does not account for the inhomogeneity of the illumination or the transducer directivity. CONCLUSIONS: A fan-shaped illumination geometry is feasible for PAT; however, it is important to account for non-uniform fluence in illumination scenarios such as this. Future work will focus on increasing fluence and further optimizing the ultrasound hardware to improve SNR and overall image quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".