MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103197541

Reconfigurable fractional microwave signal processor based on a microcomb

2019· preprint· en· W3103197541 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAustralian Research Council1000 Talents Sichuan ProgramMinistère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec
KeywordsDifferentiatorHilbert transformMicrowavePassbandSignal processingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)SIGNAL (programming language)Fractional Fourier transformFourier transformDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsMathematicsBand-pass filterComputer hardwareSpectral densityEngineeringMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and demonstrate reconfigurable fractional microwave signal processing based on an integrated Kerr optical microcomb. We achieve two forms of microwave signal processing functions-A fractional Hilbert transform as well as a fractional differentiator. For the Hilbert transform we demonstrate a phase shift of 45 degrees-half that of a full Hilbert transform, while for the differentiator we achieve square-root differentiation. For both, we achieve high resolution over a broad bandwidth of 17 GHz with a phase deviation of less than 5{\mathrm {o}} within the achieved passband. This performance in both the frequency and time domains demonstrates the versatility and power of micro-combs as a basis for high performance microwave signal processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207