MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103291627 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731249

Seeds of Life in Space (SOLIS)

2017· article· en· W3103291627 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Codella, C. Ceccarelli, P. Caselli, Nadia Balucani, Vincenzo Barone, F. Fontani, B. Leflóch, L. Podio, S. Viti, Siyi Feng, R. Bachiller, E. Bianchi, F. Dulieu, Izaskun Jiménez-Serra, Jonathan Holdship, R. Neri, J. E. Pineda, Andy Pon, Ian Sims, S. Spezzano, A. I. Vasyunin, F. O. Alves, L. Bizzocchi, S. Bottinelli, E. Caux, A. Chacón-Tanarro, R. Choudhury, A. Coutens, Cécile Favre, P. Hily-Blant, C. Kahane, A. Jaber Al-Edhari, J. Laas, A. López-Sepulcre, J. Ospina, Yoko Oya, A. Punanova, Cristina Puzzarini, D. Quénard, Albert Rimola, Nami Sakai, Dimitrios Skouteris, V. Taquet, L. Testi, P. Theulé, Piero Ugliengo, C. Vastel, Fanny Vazart, L. Wiesenfeld, Satoshi Yamamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAgence Nationale de la RechercheScuola Normale SuperioreMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaConseil National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSpace (punctuation)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Modern versions of the Miller-Urey experiment claim that formamide (NH2CHO) could be the starting point for the formation of metabolic and genetic macromolecules. Intriguingly, formamide is indeed observed in regions forming solar-type stars and in external galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations138
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207