Fasciculation frequency at the biceps <scp>brachii</scp> and brachialis muscles is associated with <scp>amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</scp> disease burden and activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fasciculations are most commonly seen in the biceps brachii muscle in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In this study we have explored the association between fasciculation frequency in a single location-biceps brachii and brachialis muscles (BB), and disease burden and activity. METHODS: Sonographic muscle studies were performed in 90 ALS patients, 47 of whom were seen in subsequent follow-up. The association between fasciculations frequency at the BB and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and manual muscle testing (MMT) scores was determined. RESULTS: High fasciculation frequency at the BB, where detection rate was the highest, was associated with shorter disease duration, greater muscle thickness, higher MMT scores, and faster rate of decline in ALSFRS-R initially, and MMT subsequently. DISCUSSION: High fasciculation frequency at the BB as determined by sonography, is associated with less impairment at time of examination, and a more active disease with a more rapid progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".