Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivated by the need for robust models of the Covid-19 epidemic that adequately reflect the extreme heterogeneity of humans and society, this paper presents a novel framework that treats a population of N individuals as an inhomogeneous random social network (IRSN). The nodes of the network represent individuals of different types and the edges represent significant social relationships. An epidemic is pictured as a contagion process that develops day by day, triggered by a seed infection introduced into the population on day 0. Individuals’ social behaviour and health status are assumed to vary randomly within each type, with probability distributions that vary with their type. A formulation and analysis is given for a SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infective-removed) network contagion model, considered as an agent based model, which focusses on the number of people of each type in each compartment each day. The main result is an analytical formula valid in the large N limit for the stochastic state of the system on day t in terms of the initial conditions. The formula involves only one-dimensional integration. The model can be implemented numerically for any number of types by a deterministic algorithm that efficiently incorporates the discrete Fourier transform. While the paper focusses on fundamental properties rather than far ranging applications, a concluding discussion addresses a number of domains, notably public awareness, infectious disease research and public health policy, where the IRSN framework may provide unique insights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".