MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Control Algorithm for Small-Scale Wind Generation System using Aerodynamic Torque Estimator

2020· article· en· W3103570131 on OpenAlexaff
Guanhong Song, Bo Cao, Liuchen Chang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Wind speedTurbineAerodynamicsTorqueRotational speedComputer scienceWind powerController (irrigation)Tip-speed ratioPower optimizerMaximum power point trackingEngineeringControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel speed control algorithm for small-scale wind generation system using an aerodynamic torque estimator is presented in this paper to enhance the performance of the system under rapid wind speed changes. The regulation of the wind turbine in tracking the optimal reference is the most important aspect in achieving the maximum power extraction of the small-scale wind generation system when operating under various wind conditions. However, due to the uncertainty nature of the wind, the rotation speed of the wind turbine may fluctuate and deviate from its optimal speed when there exist sudden wind changes resulting in degradation in the performance of the system. Hence, a proper speed control is essential to track the optimal reference, to achieve the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) operation and to minimize the fluctuation in the rotation speed under wind speed changes. The proposed speed control algorithm estimates the aerodynamic torque generated from the wind turbine and integrates with a speed PI controller to achieve better speed transient performance during wind speed changes. Detailed mathematical analysis, transfer function analysis, stability analysis and simulation results are also presented in this paper to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207