MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103675002 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.28462

Effet du stress salin sur la croissance de quatre provenances d’anacardier (Anacardium occidentale L.) en milieu semi-contrôlé

2020· article· fr· W3103675002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cheikh Oumar Samb, Dethie Wade, Elhadji Faye, Mouhamadou Moustapha Diaw

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicGinkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnacardiumBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail se propose d’évaluer le comportement des plants de quatre provenances d’anacardier (Anacardium occidentale L.) dans des conditions de stress salin. Cinq concentrations croissantes de NaCl pur 0 ; 5 ; 7,5 ; 10 ; 12,5 gl-1 ont été testées suivant un dispositif complètement aléatoire. Les résultats ont montré une variabilité de la croissance dendrométrique, du développement de l’espèce en fonction de l’intensité du stress et de la provenance. Le seuil critique de croissance des provenances de Anacardium occidentale L. est 7,5 gl-1. La provenance Ziguinchor s’est montrée plus tolérante tandis que celle de Fatick est plus sensible. Un élargissement de la gamme de salinité pourrait donner des informations complémentaires sur le statut halotolérant de Anacardium occidentale L.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicGinkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207