MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103689522 · doi:10.4000/studifrancesi.26872

G. Dotoli, Francophonie et langue française au début du troisième millénaire et M. Quaghebeur, Et si nous parlions enfin des francophonies culturelles?, in G. Dotoli (dir.), Où va la francophonie au début du troisième millénaire?, Actes du Colloque de Bari, 4-5 mai 2005

2007· article· fr· W3103689522 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Chiara Gnocchi

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’histoire nous enseigne que toute fin de siècle – et plus encore toute fin de millénaire – est source d’inquiétudes et d’appréhensions. Vice-versa, le début d’une nouvelle ère déchaîne souvent les énergies, et encourage les bons propos. Les 4 et 5 mai 2005, un colloque international a eu lieu à Bari, intitulé Où va la francophonie au début du troisième millénaire?, dont Schena vient de publier les actes. Évoqué dans un moment historique aussi crucial, le sujet, qui est au cœur de l’activité ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207