Network Partition-Based Two-Layer Optimal Scheduling for Active Distribution Networks With Multiple Stakeholders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a two-layer optimal scheduling strategy to handle the overvoltage problem in high photovoltaic (PV) power-penetrated distribution networks. The voltage regulators can be classified as the power utility and PV owners, which are referred to as stakeholders. The proposed scheduling strategy includes autonomous optimization layer and coordination optimization layer. In the autonomous optimization layer, a min-max robust game model and a mixed-integer second-order cone programming-based model are respectively proposed to minimize the operating costs of PV stakeholders and the power utility stakeholder. A parallel optimization is employed to solve the two models in the autonomous optimization layer. In the coordination optimization layer, a noncooperative game-based model is presented to coordinate scheduling solutions of each stakeholder. Finally, an actual 10 kV, 106-bus feeder in Zhejiang Province, China, and a modified IEEE 123-bus distribution system are employed to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it