Symplectomorphism groups and embeddings of balls into rational ruled 4-manifolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let M 0 µ denote S² × S² endowed with a split symplectic form µσ⊕σ normalized so that µ ≥ 1 and σ(S 2) = 1. Given a symplectic embedding ι: Bc ֒ → M 0 µ of the standard ball of capacity c ∈ (0,1) into M 0 µ, consider the corresponding symplectic blow-up f M 0 µ,c. In this paper, we study the homotopy type of the symplectomorphism group Symp ( f M 0 µ,c) and that of the space ℑEmb(Bc, M 0 µ) of unparametrized symplectic embeddings of Bc into M 0 µ. Writing ℓ for the largest integer strictly smaller than µ, and λ ∈ (0,1] for the difference µ − ℓ, we show that the symplectomorphism group of a blow-up of “small ” capacity c < λ is homotopically equivalent to the stabilizer of a point in Symp(M 0 µ), while that of a blow-up of “large ” capacity c ≥ λ is homotopically equivalent to the stabilizer of a point in the symplectomorphism group of a nontrivial bundle CP 2 # CP 2 obtained by blowing down f M 0 µ,c. It follows that for c < λ, the space ℑEmb(Bc, M 0 µ) is homotopy equivalent to S 2 × S 2, while for c ≥ λ, it is not homotopy equivalent to any finite CW-complex. A similar result holds for symplectic ruled manifolds diffeomorphic to CP 2 # CP 2. By contrast, we show that the embedding spaces ℑEmb(Bc, CP 2) and ℑEmb(Bc1 ⊔Bc2, CP 2), if non empty, are always homotopy equivalent to the spaces of ordered configurations F(CP 2,1) ≃ CP 2 and F(CP 2,2). Our method relies on the theory of pseudo-holomorphic curves in 4-manifolds, on the computation of Gromov invariants in rational 4-manifolds, and on the inflation technique of Lalonde-McDuff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".