Testing Models of Radio Galaxy Evolution and the Cosmological Impact of FR II Radio Galaxies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate aspects of the cosmological evolution of FR II radio galaxies, focusing first on the abilities of models to match data for linear-sizes, radio powers, redshifts and spectral indices. Here we consider modifications to the theoretical models we had treated earlier, primarily by accounting for the growth of the radius of hotspots with source size. Better fits to the distributions of most of the data in three low-frequency surveys can be found with sensible choices of model parameters but no model yet considered gives a good match to all of the survey data simultaneously, nor does any do a good job of producing the spectral index distributions. The observational datasets are too small to completely discriminate among the models. We calculate the volume fraction of the ``relevant universe'' cumulatively occupied by the expanding radio galaxy lobes over the quasar era, when these powerful radio galaxies were much more common, and when they have been argued to play an important role in triggering galaxy formation and spreading magnetic fields and metals. We found the cumulative relevant volume filling factor of radio galaxies to be $\\sim 5 %$, so we conclude that these impacts are smaller than previously estimated but that they are still significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".