MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103920687

Temperature-Phased Biological Hydrolysis (TPBH) Pretreatment for Anaerobic Digestion Performance Enhancement of Municipal Wastewater Sludge

2020· dissertation· en· W3103920687 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Beraki Bahre Mehari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsAnaerobic digestionThermal hydrolysisHydrolysisWastewaterWaste managementPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceDigestion (alchemy)ChemistrySewage treatmentSewage sludge treatmentEngineeringMethaneChromatographyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anaerobic sludge digestion is used to stabilize wastewater sludge and can produce methane-rich biogas. Thermal hydrolysis (TH) and biological hydrolysis (BH) are the two main growing anaerobic digestion (AD) pretreatment technologies, both of which have demonstrated the capacity to enhance biogas production and solids destruction. Despite the BH pretreatment has been commercialized, it still needs improvements because the BH-AD process is at an early stage of its development where the process optimization and system upgrading remained open for further studies. The main objectives of this research were to understand and investigate the BH-AD operating parameters and to optimize the BH process for AD performance enhancement. Although it is important to establish whether the BH treatment could achieve a comparable AD performance enhancement to the TH, to the best of my knowledge, no direct comparison between these two sludge pretreatment technologies has yet been made by previously published studies under the same operational conditions. In the first stage of the study, experiments were carried out to compare the temperature-phased BH (TPBH) at temperature combinations of 42 oC and 55 oC against TH treatment at 165 oC. The results showed that BH treatment could achieve a comparative methane production enhancement for the AD of wastewater sludge. In the second stage of the study, the BH process optimization experiments were carried out to understand the impact of BH temperature, temperature phasing (TP), hydraulic retention time, solid content, BH inoculum, and AD inoculum on the BH-AD process performance. Such an understanding of the operating conditions of the BH-AD process could help to gain a deep insight into the optimization and design of the TPBH-AD process. This Ph.D. thesis is thus significant for the development, optimization, and design of the TPBH-AD process for wastewater sludge treatment, which could exert a significant impact to produce renewable energy from wastewater sludge and reduce CO2 emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207