Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Manuscript & supplementary materials (.pdf), interactive figures (.fig) and data (.dat).<br>Update 30th June 2017: Added .dat files for full complex dipoles (N2 only).<br><br>Update 12th Feb 2017: Added PDF "Response to Comment on ``Time delays in molecular photoionization'': Extended Discussion & Technical Notes". This is the technical response to a recent comment on the original article (to be published in J. Phys. B). Arxiv 1612.00481.Interested readers can also consult https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3511731 for further background materials.<br>Update 11th July 2016: Added .dat files for Tw data (finally).<br>Update 1st June 2016: updated arxiv version of the manuscript. The published version can be found in J. Phys. B 49, 095602 (2016), doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/49/9/095602 (see link below).<br>Update 5th April 2016: added some additional notes on scattering theory & use of ePolyScat.<br>Update 9th Feb. 2016: angular line-outs added to Supplementary Material PDF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.232 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it