MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FAIR Access to Personal Health Information in Private and Public COVID-19 Health Applications

2020· preprint· en· W3104118410 on OpenAlexaff
André Carrington, Douglas G. Manuel, Carol Bennett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordseHealthInternet privacyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BusinessPandemicCorporate governancePersonally identifiable informationPublic healthTracking (education)Health carePublic relationsComputer securityComputer scienceMedicinePsychologyPolitical scienceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are an increasing number of consumer smartphone and eHealth applications that are potentially helpful for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. These applications include contact tracing, proximity tracking, eThermometers and heart rate monitoring. Consumers should have access to their data and the ability to share as much or as little, as they see fit, with public health agencies, healthcare providers or researchers--thereby respecting their privacy and their wishes. One patient's choice or risk does not affect another's. We recommend applying FAIR data principles, supported by changes to laws and governance, to meet these needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207