MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104205105 · doi:10.1039/d0lc00965b

Monolithic hydrogel nanowells-in-microwells enabling simultaneous single cell secretion and phenotype analysis

2020· article· en· W3104205105 on OpenAlexafffund
Jane Ru Choi, Jeong Hyun Lee, Alec Xu, Kerryn Matthews, Shuyong Xie, Simon P. Duffy, Hongshen Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueLab on a Chip · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsMicropatterningSecretionPhenotypeCellCell biologyMaterials scienceLaserSingle-cell analysisNanotechnologyChemistryBiologyBiochemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytokine secretion is a form of cellular communication that regulates a wide range of biological processes. A common approach for measuring cytokine secretion from single cells is to confine individual cells in arrays of nanoliter wells (nanowells) fabricated using polydimethylsiloxane. However, this approach cannot be easily integrated in standard microwell plates in order to take advantage of high-throughput infrastructure for automated and multiplexed analysis. Here, we used laser micropatterning to fabricate monolithic hydrogel nanowells inside wells in a microwell plate (microwells) using polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA). This approach produces high-aspect ratio nanowells that retain cells and beads during reagent exchange, enabling simultaneous profiling of single cell secretion and phenotyping via immunostaining. To limit contamination between nanowells, we used methylcellulose as a media additive to reduce diffusion distance. Patterning nanowells monolithically in microwells also dramatically increases density, providing ∼1200 nanowells per microwell in a microwell plate. Using this approach, we profiled IL-8 secretion from single MDA-MB-231 cells, which showed significant heterogeneity. We further profiled the polarization of THP-1 cells into M1 and M2 macrophages, along with their associated IL-1β and CCL-22 secretion profiles. These results demonstrate the potential to use this approach for high-throughput secretion and phenotype analysis on single cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLab on a ChipSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207