MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Critical nuclear charge and shape resonances for the two-electron Hamiltonian

2015· article· en· W3104220232 on OpenAlexaff
Z-C Yan, Y. K. Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsElectronAtomic physicsMetastabilityEffective nuclear chargeGround stateExcited stateHamiltonian (control theory)Charge (physics)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrogen negative ion H$^-$ is the simplest two-electron system that exists in nature. This system is not only important in astrophysics but it also serves as an ideal ground to study electron-electron correlations. The peculiar balance of the correlations between the two electrons with the interaction of electron-nucleus in H$^-$ makes this system to have only two bound states, one being the ground state $1s^2\,^{1}\!S^e$ and the other the doubly-excited metastable state $2p^2\,^{3}\!P^e$ embedded below the hydrogen $n=2$ threshold. Here we report a calculation for the $2p^2\,^{3}\!P^e$ state of H$^-$ that yields the energy eigenvalue $E=-0.125\,355\,451\,242\,864\,058\,376\,012\,313\,25(2)$, in atomic units. Our result substantially improves the best available result by 16 orders of magnitude. We further study the critical nuclear charge $Z_{\rm cr}$, the minimum value of nuclear charge $Z$ that is required to bind a nucleus and two electrons. Our determination of $Z_{\rm cr}$ for the $2p^2\,^{3}\!P^e$ state of two-electron systems is $Z_{\rm cr}=0.994\,781\,292\,240\,366\,246\,3(1)$, corresponding to $1/Z_{\rm cr}= 1.005\,246\,085\,546\,985\,509\,4(1)$, which improves the best published value of $Z_{\rm cr}$ by about 10 orders of magnitude. We further investigate in a definitive way the unexplored regime of $Z < Z_{\rm cr}$ using the method of complex scaling and establish precise shape resonance poles for the state of $2p^2\,^{3}\!P^e$ in the complex energy plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207