MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104250510

Στρατηγικές διοίκησης μέσα από διαφορετικές κουλτούρες

2016· article· el· W3104250510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Μαρία Ξενάκη, Αργυρώ Μπινιάρη

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageel
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement, Economics, and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaBusinessPublic relationsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The management strategies and practices frequently differ nationally and worldwide. One that can be considered as acceptable in one culture, may not be accepted in another culture. As managers are increasingly getting into touch with different cultures, the need of understanding these differences is of high importance. We live in world on constant change and we realize it more and more. The business cycles are becoming more and more dynamic and unpredictable and as a result uncertainty is created. This dissertation examines why these differences exist and how global managers can develop strategies and tactics to cope with. In this dissertation, there are a lot of examples from all over the world like Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicManagement, Economics, and Public PolicyFrench-language works237,207