MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104252006 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14173

A Study of the Impact Response of Discrete Regions of the Human Cadaver Brain

2020· dissertation· en· W3104252006 on OpenAlexafffund
Scott Dutrisac

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsDisplacement (psychology)Cadaveric spasmCorpus callosumHead (geology)Brain traumaHuman headComputer scienceFinite element methodEngineeringStructural engineeringTraumatic brain injuryNeuroscienceGeologyMedicinePsychologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The risk of trauma to the brain due to head impacts is high, despite widespread use of protective equipment and injury mitigation efforts.Mitigation techniques are developed through simulations that utilize complex finite element models of the brain and head.Validation of such models is limited, as existing empirical data is sparse.Due to technical constraints, empirical studies have only revealed broad brain tissue deformation.The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive methodology for measuring the displacement of discrete brain structures during impact.An advanced X-ray system was used to capture brain motion for two cadaveric specimens at 7,500 fps.Displacement of brain structures was determined for 7 impacts on each specimen.Motion trends were region dependent, with some regions exhibiting multi-modal displacement.Displacement of discrete structures including the corpus callosum was measured.These methods will help clarify the response of the brain to impact.iii When I started working on this project in the fall of 2017, I was fairly certain that next two years would be a breeze.I am humbled to report that I was very wrong.The last three years, have been a roller-coaster of excitement, challenges, incredible learning -all of which were wonderful, but none of which were a breeze.Over this time, I have been involved with some exciting work, been to some thrilling places, and experienced the fallout of the 2020 Pandemic.Despite these ups and downs, I have still managed to reach a destination.While I take a moment to reflect on how I got here, I find it necessary to acknowledge the folks who helped make it happen.I must first recognize my co-supervisors, Professors Oren Petel and Hanspeter Frei, who convinced me to join their team years ago.Each of these outstanding professors has boosted my abilities and this work would not be remotely possible without their contributions.I have truly enjoyed working as a colleague on this project and others that may come along in the future.To Oren, thank you for your knowledge, insights, patience, fair treatment, and willingness-to-stay-in-the-lab-until-the-sun-comes-up.These experiences have helped me become a better student, teacher, and researcher.To Hanspeter, if not for your expertise in cadaver work,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207