MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104400101

OGLE-2013-BLG-0102LA,B: MICROLENSING BINARY WITH COMPONENTS AT STAR/BROWN DWARF AND BROWN DWARF/PLANET BOUNDARIES

2019· article· en· W3104400101 on OpenAlexaff
Youn Kil Jung, A. Udalski, T. Sumi, Cheongho Han, Andrew Gould, J. Skowron, S. Kozłowski, R. Poleski, Ł. Wyrzykowski, M. K. Szymański, G. Pietrzyński, I. Soszyński, K. Ulaczyk, P. Pietrukowicz, P. Mróz, M. Kubiak, F. Abe, D. P. Bennett, I. A. Bond, C. S. Botzler, M. Freeman, Akihiko Fukui, D. Fukunaga, Y. Itow, Naoki Koshimoto, Patricia Larsen, C. H. Ling, K. Masuda, Y. Matsubara, Y. Muraki, S. Namba, Koji Ohnishi, L. Philpott, Nicholas J. Rattenbury, To. Saito, D. J. Sullivan, D. Suzuki, P. J. Tristram, Naoki Tsurumi, K. Wada, N. Yamai, P. C. M. Yock, A. Yonehara, Michael D. Albrow, J.-Y. Choi, D. L. DePoy, B. Scott Gaudi, Kyu‐Ha Hwang, Chung‐Uk Lee, H. Park, S. Owen, R. W. Pogge, In-Gu Shin, Jennifer C. Yee

Bibliographic record

VenueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGravitational microlensingBrown dwarfPhysicsCaustic (mathematics)AstrophysicsPlanetGravitational lensLight curveProper motionMass ratioAnomaly (physics)Lens (geology)AstronomyStarsOpticsGalaxyMathematical physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the analysis of the gravitational microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-0102. The light curve of the event is characterized by a strong short-term anomaly superposed on a smoothly varying lensing curve with a moderate magnification $A_{\rm max}\sim 1.5$. It is found that the event was produced by a binary lens with a mass ratio between the components of $q = 0.13$ and the anomaly was caused by the passage of the source trajectory over a caustic located away from the barycenter of the binary. From the analysis of the effects on the light curve due to the finite size of the source and the parallactic motion of the Earth, the physical parameters of the lens system are determined. The measured masses of the lens components are $M_{1} = 0.096 \pm 0.013~M_{\odot}$ and $M_{2} = 0.012 \pm 0.002~M_{\odot}$, which correspond to near the hydrogen-burning and deuterium-burning mass limits, respectively. The distance to the lens is $3.04 \pm 0.31~{\rm kpc}$ and the projected separation between the lens components is $0.80 \pm 0.08~{\rm AU}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207