MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104413554 · doi:10.1111/medu.14414

Emancipatory knowledge and epistemic reflexivity: The knowledge and practice for change?

2020· letter· en· W3104413554 on OpenAlexaff
Stella Ng, Paula Rowland, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Education · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Education and Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityThe Wilson CentreUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflexivityEpistemologySociologyPsychologySocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ng et al. argue that the antidote to solution‐ism may be epistemic reflexivity and its emphasis on personal and emancipatory knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.018
Scholarly communication0.0090.013
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0870.063
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical EducationSame topicInnovative Education and Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207