Continuous Emotion Recognition with Spatiotemporal Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facial expressions are one of the most powerful ways to depict specific patterns in human behavior and describe the human emotional state. However, despite the impressive advances of affective computing over the last decade, automatic video-based systems for facial expression recognition still cannot correctly handle variations in facial expression among individuals as well as cross-cultural and demographic aspects. Nevertheless, recognizing facial expressions is a difficult task, even for humans. This paper investigates the suitability of state-of-the-art deep learning architectures based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to deal with long video sequences captured in the wild for continuous emotion recognition. For such an aim, several 2D CNN models that were designed to model spatial information are extended to allow spatiotemporal representation learning from videos, considering a complex and multi-dimensional emotion space, where continuous values of valence and arousal must be predicted. We have developed and evaluated convolutional recurrent neural networks, combining 2D CNNs and long short term-memory units and inflated 3D CNN models, which are built by inflating the weights of a pre-trained 2D CNN model during fine-tuning, using application-specific videos. Experimental results on the challenging SEWA-DB dataset have shown that these architectures can effectively be fine-tuned to encode spatiotemporal information from successive raw pixel images and achieve state-of-the-art results on such a dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".