Values and the Courts: Maintaining the Rule of Law in the Global World
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thank you for allowing me to be with you today.We are honored that this group, devoted to the study and practice of international law, have chosen to hold its meeting in Montreal, one of Canada's great cities. La Ville de Montreal est un endroit bien choisi pour votre riunion. Depuispresque 400 ans, elle est un point de rencontre: pour les autochtones et les europeens, pour les francophones et les anglophones, pour les catholiques, les protestants et lesjuifs, et, plus recemment, pour a peu prs toutes les nations, religions et traditions du monde. C'est viritablement une ville internationale.Montreal is a city of the world.Yet peer beneath its cosmopolitan surface, and you will see that it is a city of its place, and that its place is the Province of Quebec, in the country of Canada.It is a city where French is spoken, where steeples and street names recall its religious past, where poutine and foie gras flavor its cuisine.Canada, a land of immigrants overlaid on a tapestry of indigenous peoples, proclaims itself in this city's unique blend of colors and sounds and ways of interacting.As you have been told, I, a person of no particular background or pretention, have the honor to serve as this country's Chief Justice-the first woman to be named to that position.I mention this not to boast, but because of what it says about my country.It is a fair country, a country committed to equality of opportunity and status.A country built on a firm belief in the inherent dignity of every individual-rich and poor; male and female; black, white, and all the hues of the human race.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it