MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104785497 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/abd5f8

Néel ordering in the distorted honeycomb pyrosilicate: C–Er <sub>2</sub> Si <sub>2</sub> O <sub>7</sub>

2020· article· en· W3104785497 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchColorado State UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismNeutron diffractionMagnetismIsostructuralGround stateMagnetic momentMagnetic structureLattice (music)Diffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The rare-earth pyrosilicate family of compounds (RE 2 Si 2 O 7 ) hosts a variety of polymorphs, some with honeycomb-like geometries of the rare-earth sublattices, and the magnetism has yet to be deeply explored in many of the cases. Here we report on the ground state properties of C–Er 2 Si 2 O 7 . C–Er 2 Si 2 O 7 crystallizes in the C2/m space group and the Er 3+ atoms form a distorted honeycomb lattice in the a – b plane. We have utilized specific heat, DC susceptibility, and neutron diffraction measurements to characterize C–Er 2 Si 2 O 7 . Our specific heat and DC susceptibility measurements show signatures of antiferromagnetic ordering at 2.3 K. Neutron powder diffraction confirms this transition temperature and the relative intensities of the magnetic Bragg peaks are consistent with a collinear Néel state in the magnetic space group C2’/m, with ordered moment of 6.61 μ B canted 13° away from the c -axis toward the a -axis. These results are discussed in relation to the isostructural quantum dimer magnet compound Yb 2 Si 2 O 7 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207