RNN-Based User Trajectory Prediction Using a Preprocessed Dataset
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future mobile networks are rightly expected to face the prospect of limited available resources. Continuous technological advances and growing number of mobile devices highlight the importance of further improving the performance of mobile networks. User mobility poses technical problems in network management. It is essential to ensure a satisfactory level of quality of service for users. To achieve this goal, self organizing networks (SONs) are potential solutions to fulfill the requirements of users using learning algorithms. In this paper, we propose an intelligent mobility model to predict future trajectory of the mobile user in mobile networks. The proposed approach has two main parts, including mobility data preparation and user mobility prediction. Our primary focus is on providing a carefully tailored mobility data from raw mobility datasets using line simplification techniques. Next, we use the accurately prepared data for learning user mobility behaviour and predicting user future trajectory using recurrent neural networks and its variants. Simulation results show a substantial decrease in execution time from 4616s to 932s for the best case. The proposed learning approach obtains a loss value of 0.10 using a model based on long short term memory (LSTM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it