MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Nature of UCDs: Internal Dynamics from an Expanded Sample and Homogeneous Database ⋆

2013· article· en· W3105215349 on OpenAlexaff
Steffen Mieske, M. Hilker, Andrés Jordán, L. Infante, M. Kissler‐Patig, M. Rejkuba

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneousContext (archaeology)PhysicsGeographyStatistical physicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. The internal dynamics of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies (UCDs) has attracted increasing attention, with most of the UCDs studied to date located in the Virgo cluster. Aims. Our aim is to perform a comprehensive census of the internal dynamics of UCDs in the Fornax cluster, and to shed light on the nature of the interface between star clusters and galaxies. Methods. We obtained high-resolution spectra of 23 Fornax UCDs with –$10.4>M_V>-13.5$ mag ($10^6<{ M/M_{\sun}<10^8}$), using FLAMES/Giraffe at the VLT. This is the largest homogeneous data set of UCD internal dynamics assembled to date. We derive dynamical $M/L$ ratios for 15 UCDs covered by HST imaging. Results. In the MV–σ plane, UCDs with $M_V<-12$ mag are consistent with the extrapolated Faber-Jackson relation for luminous elliptical galaxies, while most of the fainter UCDs are closer to the extrapolated globular cluster (GC) relation. At a given metallicity, Fornax UCDs have, on average, $M/L$ ratios lower by 30–40% than Virgo UCDs, suggesting possible differences in age or dark matter content between Fornax and Virgo UCDs. For our sample of Fornax UCDs we find no significant correlation between $M/L$ ratio and mass. We combine our data with available $M/L$ ratio measurements of compact stellar systems with $10^4<{ M/M_{\sun}}<10^8$ M, and normalise all $M/L$ estimates to solar metallicity. We find that UCDs ($M \gtrsim 2 \times 10^6~M_{\sun}$) have $M/L$ ratios twice as large as GCs ($M\lesssim 2 \times 10^6~M_{\sun}$). We argue that dynamical evolution has probably had only a small effect on the current $M/L$ ratios of objects in the combined sample, implying that stellar population models tend to under-predict dynamical $M/L$ ratios of UCDs and over-predict those of GCs. Considering the scaling relations of stellar spheroids, we find that UCDs align well along the “Fundamental Manifold”. UCDs can be considered the small-scale end of the galaxy sequence in this context. The alignment for UCDs is especially clear for $r_{\rm e} \gtrsim 7$ pc, which corresponds to dynamical relaxation times that exceed a Hubble time. In contrast, globular clusters exhibit a broader scatter and do not appear to align along the manifold. Conclusions. We argue that UCDs are the smallest dynamically un-relaxed stellar systems, with $M\gtrsim 2 \times 10^6~M_{\sun}$ and $7\lesssim{r_{\rm e}/{\rm pc}} \lesssim 100$. Future studies should aim at explaining the elevated $M/L$ ratios of UCDs and the environmental dependence of their properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→