MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105309898 · doi:10.1109/ipc47351.2020.9252468

Thermo-Photonic Detection of THC in Oral Fluid: Transition from Bench-Top System to Handheld Device

2020· article· en· W3105309898 on OpenAlexaff
Damber Thapa, Nakisa Samadi, Nisarg Patel, Nima Tabatabaei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabisDetection limitDrug detectionTetrahydrocannabinolLaw enforcementMobile deviceMaterials scienceComputer scienceMedicineChemistryCannabinoidChromatographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cannabis is one of the most widely used illicit drug worldwide. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main intoxicating ingredient in cannabis that impair a person's ability to drive. While operating a motor vehicle while impaired by drug is prohibited, the problem of drug-impaired driving has become more prevalent in recent years [1] . In addition, workplace safety field studies suggest that acute intoxication from cannabis smoking significantly impair employees' performance, leading to increased risks of work-related accidents [2] . Therefore, there is currently an unmet need for rapid, accurate and on-site screening devices for cannabis consumption detection in both workplaces and law enforcement. To address this need, detection of THC in oral fluids using affinity chromatography technologies such as lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) has been recently explored. While LFA technologies offer simple, portable and non-invasive detection of THC from oral fluid, their limit of detection is normally limited to greater than 25 ng/ml which is insufficient for proper enforcement of per se regulations. In this work, we present an alternative method of detecting THC in LFAs which enhances the limit of detection by over an order of magnitude. Unlike conventional LFA detection/reader technologies that are based on the scattering of light by immobilized gold nanoparticles (GNPs), our innovation explores the thermal signatures of GNPs in response to modulated laser illumination [3] - [4] . Our results (n=240) suggest that the demodulation of localized surface plasmon resonance responses of GNPs captured by infrared cameras allows for detection of THC concentrations as low as 2 ng/ml with an accuracy of 95%. In order to demonstrate the viability of our technology for commercialization, we have also constructed a portable prototype using low-cost ($250) cellphone attachment infrared cameras with which detection cut off of 2ng/ml has been achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207