Multispectral diffuse reflectance can discriminate blood vessels and bleeding during neurosurgery based on low-frequency hemodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: The practicality of optical methods detecting tissue optical contrast (absorption, elastic and inelastic scattering, fluorescence) for surgical guidance is limited by interferences from blood pooling and the resulting partial or complete inability to interrogate cortex and blood vessels. AIM: A multispectral diffuse reflectance technique was developed for intraoperative brain imaging of hemodynamic activity to automatically discriminate blood vessels, cortex, and bleeding at the brain surface. APPROACH: A manual segmentation of blood pooling, cortex, and vessels allowed the identification of a frequency range in hemoglobin concentration variations associated with high optical signal in blood vessels and cortex but not in bleeding. Reflectance spectra were then used to automatically segment areas with and without hemodynamic activity as well as to discriminate blood from cortical areas. RESULTS: The frequency range associated with low-frequency hemodynamics and respiratory rate (0.03 to 0.3 Hz) exhibits the largest differences in signal amplitudes for bleeding, blood vessels, and cortex. A segmentation technique based on simulated reflectance spectra initially allowed discrimination of blood (bleeding and vessels) from cortical tissue. Then, a threshold applied to the low-frequency components from deoxyhemoglobin allowed the segmentation of bleeding from vessels. A study on the minimum acquisition time needed to discriminate all three components determined that ∼25 s was necessary to detect changes in the low-frequency range. Other frequency ranges such as heartbeat (1 to 1.7 Hz) can be used to reduce the acquisition time to few seconds but would necessitate optimizing instrumentation to ensure larger signal-to-noise ratios are achieved. CONCLUSIONS: A method based on multispectral reflectance signals and low-frequency hemoglobin concentration changes can be used to distinguish bleeding, blood vessels, and cortex. This could be integrated into fiber optic probes to enhance signal specificity by providing users an indication of whether measurements are corrupted by blood pooling, an important confounding factor in biomedical optics applied to surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".