MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3105465456 · doi:10.1161/circ.142.suppl_4.338

Abstract 338: Relationship Between Post-arrest Care Cardiac Index and Clinical Outcomes in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the CAPITAL-RETURN Trial

2020· article· en· W3105465456 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Russo, Paul Boland, Simon Parlow, Rudy R Unni, Pietro Di Santo, Jordan Bernick, Christina M. Osborne, Derek So, Benjamin Hibbert, Sophie De Roock, Christopher B. Fordyce, Sean van Diepen, Michel R. Le May

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaOttawa Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReturn of spontaneous circulationTargeted temperature managementModified Rankin ScaleGlasgow Coma ScaleIntensive care unitCardiac indexIntensive careProspective cohort studyInternal medicineAnesthesiaEmergency medicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationCardiologyResuscitationHemodynamicsIntensive care medicineCardiac outputIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have decreased cardiac index (CI) following return of spontaneous circulation. Although reversible, a reduced CI can contribute to cerebral hypoperfusion and impaired neurologic outcomes. We sought to examine the relationship between CI and clinical outcomes following OHCA. Methods: CAPITAL-RETURN was a prospective study examining hemodynamics in comatose survivors of OHCA undergoing targeted temperature management. Between August 2016 and December 2017, comatose survivors of OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm underwent continuous, blinded monitoring of CI using bioimpedance (Cheetah Medical, Portland, OR, USA) for 96 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. In the present study, we examined the association between CI and the composite of death or severe neurologic dysfunction at 6 months (primary outcome) using logistic regression. Severe neurologic dysfunction was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≥4. We excluded patients who died or had withdrawal of advanced life support within 72 hours of ICU admission. Results: In 53 patients in this analysis (mean age 59±13 years, downtime 24±13 minutes, STEMI 35%), the rate of the primary outcome was 25%. The mean CI was lower in patients with (3.0±0.5 L/min/m 2 ) versus without (3.3±0.5 L/min/m 2 ) the primary outcome (p=0.018). A higher mean CI during the first 96 hours of ICU admission was associated with lower rates of the primary outcome (OR 0.85 per 0.1L/min/m 2 increase in CI; p=0.025). This association persisted after adjusting for age and downtime (OR 0.78 per 0.1L/min/m2 increase in CI; p=0.014). Cardiac index was similar in patients with versus without the primary outcome at the end of the 96-hour monitoring period (Figure). Conclusion: In comatose survivors of OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm, a higher CI during the first 96 hours of ICU admission is associated with lower rates of death or severe neurologic dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→