MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Triggered/sequential star formation? A multi-phase ISM study around the prominent IRDC G18.93-0.03

2013· article· en· W3105552645 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Tackenberg, H. Beuther, R. Plume, Thomas Henning, J. M. Stil, M. Walmsley, F. Schüller, A. Schmiedeke

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJet Propulsion LaboratoryInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringEuropean Southern ObservatoryInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular MicrobiologyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsStarsStar formationAstrophysicsContext (archaeology)Star (game theory)PhysicsPhase (matter)AstronomyGeologyPaleontologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Triggered star formation has been discussed for many years, and evidence for the formation of stars and cores triggered by Hii regions is under debate. Aims. We investigate the imprints of an expanding Hii region on a pre-existing starless clumps. Methods. We selected an infrared dark filament spanning 0.8°. One portion of this filament, G18.93-0.03 is a prominent dust complex, with the molecular clump G18.93/m being IR dark from near-IR wavelength up to 160 μm. Spitzer composite images show an IR bubble spatially associated with G18.93-0.03. We use GRS 13CO and IRAM 30 m H13CO+ data to disentangle the large and small scale spatial structure of the region. From ATLASGAL submm data we calculate the gas mass, while we use the H13CO+ line width to estimate its virial mass. To study the IR properties of G18.93/m we use Herschel data and produce temperature maps from fitting the spectral energy distribution. With the MAGPIS 20 cm and SuperCOSMOS Hα data we trace the ionized gas, and the VGPS Hisurvey provides information on the atomic hydrogen gas. Results. We show that the bubble is spatially associated with G18.93, located at a kinematic near distance of 3.6 kpc. The total gas mass of ~870 M⊙ splits up into 6 sub-clumps, of which G18.93/m is the most massive with 280 M⊙. The virial analysis shows that it may be gravitationally bound and has neither Spitzer young stellar objects nor mid-IR point sources within. Therefore we call it pre-stellar. Fitting the spectral energy distribution reveals a temperature distribution that decreases towards its center, but heating from the ionizing source puts it above the general ISM temperature. We find that the bubble is filled by Hii gas, ionized by an O8.5 star. Between the ionizing source and the IR dark clump G18.93/m we find a layered structure of hydrogen phases, from ionized to atomic to molecular gas, revealing a photon dominated region. Furthermore, we identify an additional velocity component within the bubble’s 8 μm emission rim at the edge of the infrared dark cloud and speculate that it might be shock induced by the expanding Hii region. Conclusions. While the elevated temperature allows for the build-up of larger fragments, and the shock induced velocity component may lead to additional turbulent support, the density profile of G18.93/m does not show signatures of the expanding bubble. While the first two signatures favor high-mass star formation, we do not find conclusive evidence that the massive clump G18.93/m is prone to collapse because of the expanding Hii region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207